3 comments


  • A photo of a hot writer means nothing to me. I’ve met plenty of cute writers and their attitude and questionable skills sucked the hot right out of them.

    March 21, 2009
  • Ugh, pretty depressing. It would seem more innocuous for a reviewer to mention an author’s looks if beauty weren’t conflated with value throughout our society. Witness friends and commenters leaping to reassure bloggers that they’re pretty when trolls call them names.

    There’s an interesting interplay there between beauty standards and ‘professionalism’ standards — if you look at the Gawker coverage of Pessl linked to by Jezebel, they’re mocking the way she’s consented to pose for articles, especially, as well as making dumb jokes about whether or not she’s pretty. She’s posing like ‘a pretty girl’ (model or actress): throwing her long hair around, posing for outdoor shoots with whimsical camera perspectives and high heels. It makes you consider how an author (would that be ‘a smart girl’) is supposed to present herself — sweaters not dresses? Sitting, not traipsing? Definitely not jumping up and down. It also makes me wonder which side other sorts of artists — musicians, visual artists — are expected to fall on, and how they negotiate those expectations.

    March 24, 2009
  • Maybe I’m hot enough to write but not hot enough to be photographed, or maybe I’m just difficult.

    March 24, 2009

Leave a comment


Copyright © Dandelion by Pexeto