4 comments


  • Jeannine,

    I agree with your sentiment that she’s probably not reading the right books. What a sweeping generalization for someone to make about women’s poetry. Why even pigeonhole all women, anyway? We don’t all write the same way. I would recommend reading a wonderful book, Four From Japan: Contemporary Poetry & Essays by Women featuring Kiriu Minashita, Kyong-Mi Park, Ryoko Sekiguchi & Takako Arai
    These are unique poems translated from the Japanese into English. I don’t remember reading anything like them before.

    August 21, 2009
  • I don’t know. The Tin House post says genre work “almost purposefully avoids the literary, in hopes of keeping the reader (or the writer, for that matter) from having to “work” too hard.” Your poems are very readable, but they hardly avoid the literary and they show no signs of you avoiding “working too hard”. I kind of always thought it would work the other way, that having a strong, binding theme and unusual narrative would work _for_ you. Of course, that presumes editors are intererested in theme and narrative. You think it may be that characters and persona may be what’s out of favor?

    August 21, 2009
  • I think it’s dangerous for any writer to ever curry favor (not sure that’s the right term but you know what I mean) with publishers or readers. That’s when you lose your spark. It reminds me of Alice Neel who kept painting portraits that fingered the zeitgeist of each decade even after the abstract expressionists moved in and tipped the art world upside down.

    And I doubt that you, dear J9, have ever been anywhere near average.

    xor

    wv: lacti

    A lactating cactus?

    August 23, 2009
  • Sorry I’m late to the party on this — but yes, that Bookslut article was intolerable!

    I also love The Blind Assassin and Murakami, particularly The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.

    August 27, 2009

Leave a reply to Elisa Gabbert


Copyright © Dandelion by Pexeto