8 comments


  • For $600 you can produce a perfectly fine docutech book on your own.

    I think this conference is a horrible idea and I’m ashamed of the presses that are participating in it.

    August 17, 2006
  • No, Jordan, tell us how you really feel! šŸ™‚
    I assume what you don’t like is how the conference takes your money and leaves you nothing in return (Except maybe a better sense of how the system works.) But I know a lot of writers who get seriously depressed because they’ve sent their MS into one contest (say, the Yale Younger Poets) every year for ten years and never won (the shock!) I mean, wouldn’t it be better for them to know a little bit more about:
    a. the small press publishing biz
    b. how their manuscript stacks up in the eyes of professional editors
    and, isn’t it better than some poor person spending hundreds of dollars every year in contests just to get shot down, but not know why?
    This is not a defense of the conference, I’m genuinely interested…and I’m assuming the people who would be interested in this would be people who might think the idea of self-publishing slightly scandalous…hence their not already going the self-publish route…

    August 17, 2006
  • Wouldn’t it be easier (and cheaper) to just fuck one of the press editors?

    And maybe those manuscripts that went out over and over (and over) weren’t very good.

    On the other hand, it’s all about networking.

    xo

    August 17, 2006
  • I think you hit the point when you said It seems like it’s a lot cheaper option than an MFA for folks who are just trying to get a first book out there and don’t care about teaching. and I think Jordan’s comment (though it may not seem so) completely agrees with you – it just sets another point to the left on the time-and-money investment scale, for those who really just want their legacy perfect-bound and distributable.

    I probably wouldnt shell $600 out for a chance to rub elbows unless I knew I’d get 2-4 genuine, earnest reviews from presses interested in “my kind of stuff”. But then, I’d be substituting time and energy researching for the $$$ of the conference.

    Each writer should make the investment that suits their purpose.

    August 17, 2006
  • Well, I don’t know about that conference idea. It seems like it might be taking advantage of people’s desperation. Not a nice quality in my mind.

    And that thing about the young attractive female doesn’t surprise me, but does dismay me.

    August 18, 2006
  • Ai! I may slightly biased, but the MFA program allows you to continually interact with so many more cool, interesting, and bizarre people. Ahem. Not that either of us are bizarre. OK, we are, but don’t tell anyone.

    On the other hand, getting to know the ropes directly on the publishing end (which our MFA program doesn’t really focus on)is kind of cool.

    That thing about your father, by the way, is so totally awesome. Robots! I thought your father’s robot was playing the ice cream truck music that was in the background for a minute, but apparently not.

    August 20, 2006
  • I don’t know if I was qualified to, or supposed to, but I just voted for your dad.

    –Lana

    August 20, 2006
  • Thanks Lana šŸ™‚ I think it’s okay – it’s just for the “community” prize, which is kind of like the Miss Congeniality award for programming.
    Rusty – hilarious – I had no idea my Dad’s blog played music!
    Thanks everyone for the feedback on the weird conference. I wonder if it’s the start of a trend?

    August 21, 2006

Leave a comment


Copyright © Dandelion by Pexeto