What is the Role of Intelligence in Poetry?
A few days ago, I got a letter from a publisher, a publisher I respect and like, one of those contest letters about all the manuscripts they received this year, what they thought of them, yadda yadda.
I had a hard time getting past a line or two in the middle of the two page letter about intelligence in poetry. “As for intelligence-of course we assume that a poet is intelligent. And she should be. If not, no hope for anything beyong intelligence. But the person we really want to be intelligent is our doctor. More and more we’d rather our poetry impress us with an eye and heart that sees recognizable human beings, and gives them to us…”
I sat back baffled. I thought, “The person we really want to be intelligent is our doctor?” Well, no doubt. But isn’t the reason, I mean, one of the very main reasons, we read literature is to be intellectually stimulated? Is it all about feelings and mushy stuff in poetry? In fact, I was just reading one of this particular publisher’s book, a difficult book with a shattered narrative and many embedded clues to different pop culture references. It was not an easy, emotional, accessible book, and one of the reasons I liked it is because it challenged my mind. I guess I might be a “head” poet rather than a “heart” poet. I like putting science and mythology in poems, and I like reading poems about things I don’t already know. I don’t play Sudoku, instead, I like to read poems that don’t necessarily make themselves clear to me the first time around. It made me think about publishing, about poetry, about priorities. What are your poetry priorities? Do you demand that your poets be at least as intelligent as your doctor? Because I think that would be ideal.
I never think about things like references to science or folk tales being offputting to people. But I guess I should. I like poets who aren’t afraid to talk about difficult subject matter in difficult ways; this isn’t about avant–garde or quietism or whatever, it’s about demanding something from the reader, and providing something for the reader they didn’t have before. It’s about not talking down to an audience. It’s about expecting a poet to know things about the world, beyond just poetry, beyond just themselves and their feelings.
What do you think? What should the role of intelligence be in poetry?
Elisa Gabbert
I think I’m more of a head poet too — it’s not that I don’t want heart in poems, but if a poet goes straight for my heart without going through my head first, I don’t buy it.
I’ve been wishing lately there was more intelligence in poetry reviews. So tired of impressionistic reviews that don’t offer evidence or context, and just regurgitate what everyone else is saying. (a la “This book really is all that!!!”)
Karen J. Weyant
Your cited lines baffle me, too. Can’t a poet be both a head and heart poet? I tend to think that poems that go right to the heart belong in greeting cards.
jim
First, I think I’ve had enough intelligent doctors, but that doesn’t answer your question.
Me, what impresses me in poetry is intelligent language, where I am challenged and sometimes left in wonder over how that line, that phrase is possible. And I also like the intelligence that takes me outside my own areas of expertise, that venture deeply into their arcane, narrow, but important subject matter. I’m impressed with poets who know a thing or two.
mariegauthier
What they all said, and:
I like it when poems tell me something I didn’t know — and don’t supply that info in end notes — but intrigue me so much that I delve into some research of my own.
On a related note, I really dislike lazy readers.