4 comments


  • I think I’m more of a head poet too — it’s not that I don’t want heart in poems, but if a poet goes straight for my heart without going through my head first, I don’t buy it.

    I’ve been wishing lately there was more intelligence in poetry reviews. So tired of impressionistic reviews that don’t offer evidence or context, and just regurgitate what everyone else is saying. (a la “This book really is all that!!!”)

    June 07, 2010
  • Your cited lines baffle me, too. Can’t a poet be both a head and heart poet? I tend to think that poems that go right to the heart belong in greeting cards.

    June 08, 2010
  • jim

    First, I think I’ve had enough intelligent doctors, but that doesn’t answer your question.

    Me, what impresses me in poetry is intelligent language, where I am challenged and sometimes left in wonder over how that line, that phrase is possible. And I also like the intelligence that takes me outside my own areas of expertise, that venture deeply into their arcane, narrow, but important subject matter. I’m impressed with poets who know a thing or two.

    June 08, 2010
  • What they all said, and:

    I like it when poems tell me something I didn’t know — and don’t supply that info in end notes — but intrigue me so much that I delve into some research of my own.

    On a related note, I really dislike lazy readers.

    June 09, 2010

Leave a reply to mariegauthier


Copyright © Dandelion by Pexeto