Girls in a Boy’s Club: Tips for Poets
Elisa had a post about the excellent manifesto, How to Be a Woman in Any Boy’s Club. As someone who has worked in a few boy’s clubs (working as a tech manager for a decade before my foray into writing) I will say that I think poetry has some of the subtlest but also most difficult sexism I have ever run into, which makes it more frustrating. Sure, you’re welcome to the party, but only if you’re this kind of girl – and even then you’re almost statistically guaranteed less in terms of awards, grants, publication, and reviews. As I commented on Elisa’s blog, a lot of the problem is summed up in the headline I saw recently: “Women more educated, still making less than men.” In the end, we can work harder, but we still get…less.
I identified with this essay quite a bit, as I grew up with three brothers and no sisters, and automatically gravitated towards hanging out with guys for most of my life, took up stereotypically “guyish” habits, etc. I’m not a tomboy by any stretch of the imagination, but as you can see with my poetic fascination with robots, comic books, anime, etc, I definitely felt (and feel) comfortable in the quintessential fortresses of male culture. Anyway, this made me think about what I was personally doing to help poetry become less of a boy’s club.
So, since I’m a take-action kind of person, I thought I would post some tips, some action items, for poets to help make the poetry world a little bit less of a boy’s club. (Hint: these tips work equally well for men and women.)
–When you buy a book of poetry, try one by a female! When you review a book of poetry, try a book of poetry by a female.
–When you review said book of poetry by a female, try to eliminate any references to Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton, or Elizabeth Bishop. I’m so tired of reading comparisons to those three women poets, as if male reviewers haven’t read any other female poets besides those two or three. It just looks lazy, fellas.
–When you have an opportunity to pay readers, have a woman out. Remember, we’re making less money over our whole life span, so cut a sister some slack. Try to remember to invite a woman poet who is not already rolling in dough and awards – that would be extra nice.
–Female poets: start reviewing books. You have something to say about literature and your voice is just as valuable as a male reviewer’s voice. Remember, if you’re not part of the conversation, you’re letting somebody else drive it. Write like your work is something important. Send out like you already know your work is great. Don’t keep everything in an envelope in your desk hoping someone will Emily Dickinson you, because let’s face it, it’s probably not going to happen.
–Don’t automatically laud men who write a lot of sexist poetry. If I have to read one more poem comparing a woman’s body part to something edible…are we allowed to call male writers out when they compare women to animals, lessening women to the sum of their body parts, etc? I was just thinking about Tony Hoagland’s poem “The Change” and how it started a discussion of race. What about a similar discussion of sexism in poetry?
–Volunteer for literary magazines or book publishers that promote work by women. I’ve volunteered for The Seattle Review, Silk Road, The Raven Chronicles, and Crab Creek Review, and was amazed at what I learned as a board member, editor, reviewer, etc.
In a totally non-related moment: Interested in gluten-free recipes for creme brulee? Interested in gluten-free Northwest restaurant info? See my newish blog! First post has a lactose-free, gluten-free creme brulee recipe. I plan to chronicle my experiments in gluten-free cooking and restaurant-visiting there.
Elisa
Thanks for furthering the discussion! I’m usually more inclined to review a poetry book by a woman, because books by men just seem to get more coverage, perhaps in part because the name tends to already be more familiar (since men are getting published more widely).
Jeannine
Thanks Elisa! Any other suggestions – maybe we should do more as editors, too?
jim
My favorite line in Lambert’s essay is “game recognizes game,” where she notes that genuinely successful and secure men have no problem in recognizing success or excellence among their female peers.
While there is a bravado spin to that line, it strikes me as a quality I don’t recognize often with some other male poets I know, many of whom feel singularly underappreciated, unrecognized themselves, and so it makes their world view smaller, more petty.
If he is grousing about how the New York presses or the Iowa-dominated magazines have overlooked his genius, he’s not likely to be inclined to praise other contemporaries (and here I would say especially women or minorities).
And for the male poets who have game, some seem hell-bent on establishing lineage, which is awfully male-dominated as they unwind through the generations. I got this feeling in reading Dean Young’s wonderful The Art of Recklessness, in which he offers some token nods to women poets, but is consumed drawing back from Ashbery to O’Hara to the Dadaists (Breton, above all), and then mainlining back to the Romantics (Keats in a big way). He glances off Gertrude Stein (a more “reckless” writer, I’m not sure of), and I was kind of hoping that he’d stop there, with her, rather than trying to go back to the predictable father-hunt.
Essentially to recognize someone else’s game requires some generosity and humility. Of course, the saddest part of it is that it really costs nothing to pay that kind of respect, that there is no diminishment in that word of praise or admiration.
Jeannine
Good points all around, Jim.
Jessie Carty
Love this! Especially how all female poets aren’t Plath and Dickinson!
One other issue I find is how, still, it is women’s poetry if they write about say: motherhood. But if a man writes about fatherhood it is universal? Guys read both genders. Please!!
David V
Is this a good time to mention a new literary journal out of NJ focused on women’s issues? Adanna Literary Journal (http://adannajournal.blogspot.com/) is currently colleting for its inaugural issue. Founding Editor Christine Redman-Waldeyer, Issue 1 Guest Editor Diane Lockward).
As a quick note, while poetry on a national scale may be a boy’s club, here in NJ it seems to be more of a matriarchy, with much of the interesting editing and promotional work being driven by women.
Kells
Great post, J9! Will be linking you up on my blog!
Jeannine
Good post Kelli!
http://ofkells.blogspot.com/2011/03/womans-guide-to-success-in-writing.html
You know, I forgot one that works whether you’re a male or female poet: Mentor a female poet!