Webbish6

Some secret good news I can share soon…stay tuned…

An appropriate quiz from Peter Pereira after the humor in poetry talk…

the Wit

(52% dark, 30% spontaneous, 21% vulgar)

your humor style:
CLEAN COMPLEX DARK

You like things edgy, subtle, and smart. I guess that means you’re probably an intellectual, but don’t take that to mean pretentious. You realize ‘dumb’ can be witty–after all isn’t that the Simpsons’ philosophy?–but rudeness for its own sake, ‘gross-out’ humor and most other things found in a fraternity leave you totally flat.

I guess you just have a more cerebral approach than most. You have the perfect mindset for a joke writer or staff writer.

Your sense of humor takes the most thought to appreciate, but it’s also the best, in my opinion.

PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Jon Stewart – Woody Allen – Ricky Gervais

So the talk went well on Thursday, I think there were about 40 people there, and not only were the other readers good, even the open mikes were surprisingly accomplished. One of the other readers read hilarious essays on, for instance, what Dr. Phil’s advice to Proust might have been. A good time was had by all. I discussed the dictionary definitions of different modes of poetry, like satire, parody, farce, irony, and black humor, and then provided different poetry examples for each (James Tate, John Berryman, Billy Collins, Dorothy Parker and Lewis Carroll all made appearances.)
Now I’m trying to finish a review of Denise Duhamel’s Two and Two, mess around with MS # 2 a bit, and print out new copies of MS #1 for another round of submissions.

Why I like British magazines so much better than American magazines…

The August issue of Harper’s and Queen Magazine (The British equivalent of Harper’s Bazaar) commissioned three women writers to write contemporary takes on three Hans Christian Anderson fairy tales, especially for the magazine. I’d love to see that in the middle of Cosmo.

Speaking of Cosmo, and self-indulgent vanity, I need your help deciding which picture to use for my web site and other promotional stuff – my old picture is a few years old now, so I had my husband take some new shots. Let me know which one is your favorite. There’s a time limit – I’m taking the pics down tomorrow night.

Also, I’m giving a lecture tomorrow at Ravenna Third Place Books on Humor and Poetry, so if you’re in the neighborhood, come check it out.

Some good-ish news and how is James Tate like The Barenaked Ladies?

Well, along with a couple of rejection slips in the mail, today I got a notice that I was a finalist in Kent State’s Wick Book Prize. Not as good news as say, winning, but you’ve got to take what you can get…
I’m preparing a talk for the It’s About Time series on humor in poetry, and so I was reading a bunch of James Tate. One of his poems is going to be my example for Farce, which is defined as, “a comic dramatic piece that uses highly improbable situations, stereotyped characters, extravagant exaggeration, and violent horseplay. The term also refers to the class or form of drama made up of such compositions. Farce is generally regarded as intellectually and aesthetically inferior to comedy in its crude characterizations and implausible plots.” That pretty much sums up Tate’s work for me. One thing I noticed as I was reading was how closely the sense of play versus darkness and the turns in tone in Tate’s poems resemble the same action in the lyrics of the typical Barenaked Ladies song, which can switch from sincere grief or anger to flip jokiness with a turn of a line. Which makes you question whether the darkness you thought you saw in the piece was really there in the first place. Thoughts? Responses?